I’ve been at a loss for years Popularity of MyFitnessPal as a food tracker. It puts Advertisements and articles in the way of the information you actually wantand The food database is so full of inaccurate entries that they added a badge system to indicate this those, who are probably Correctly. Plus, You have announced plans to do so Put the barcode scanner behind a $20/month paywall starting in October. 1. If you are looking for an alternative to MyFitnessPalnow is a good time to get off the ship.
Fortunately, there are other apps that do what MyFitnessPal does, and many of them do it better. Barcode scanners are standard in the free version of many apps, so let’s highlight one excellent alternative and a few honorable mentions.
Cronometer is the best alternative to MyFitnessPal
The free version of Cronometer has a barcode scanner. It’s also long been better than MyFitnessPal in every way.
- The database contains a lot of food (including branded and restaurant products), minus the weird ones entered by the user that have wrong dates.
- Macros and even micronutrients like vitamins are visible in the free version.
- You can customize the display so that calories aren’t as prominent (particularly useful if you’re tracking macros or just want to keep track of calories rather than setting yourself a limit).
- You can enter custom foods and recipes.
- You can track trends on some charts (more options are available in paid version).
- You can get a weekly report of all your nutrients, including water, fiber, and vitamins and minerals.
- The premium (“Gold”) version costs $8.99/month compared to $19.99/month for MyFitnessPal.
While the free version says it has ads, I never noticed them. (I’m sure they’re in there somewhere.) And from a few items I’ve scanned around the house, it sure seems like Cronometer’s barcode scanner is one better than MFPs. Both apps correctly scanned a box of Cheerios, a jar of private label coconut oil, a Barebells protein bar, and a box of Kraft macaroni and cheese. But MyFitnessPal stumbled upon a jar of Skippy peanut butter (“Sorry, we couldn’t find a match for that barcode”), a bag of Trader Joe’s oatmeal (they were incorrectly identified as Dave’s Killer Classic English Muffins), and a squeeze Bottle of Hellman’s Mayonnaise (MFP scanned it as “light mayonnaise” at 35 calories per serving, when actually it was normal at 100 calories). Cronometer, on the other hand, did everything right.
That doesn’t seem particularly worth it given Many MFP users prefer the barcode scanner special because It’s more likely to provide accurate results than the regular database, which – as mentioned – is a mess. Just switch apps. You will have it much easier.
lose it is, to put it mildly, very focuses on weight loss. You will Go through an in-depth motivational interview-style questionnaire before even creating an account. There is no way to maintain or gain your weight, only different rates of weight loss.
However, once you get started, the interface is straightforward and the barcode scanner works well. It recognized the peanut butter, oats, and mayonnaise well.
If you want to upgrade to Premium, it costs $39.99/year. (There is no monthly option.)
sum of life is another tracker with a nice interface and reasonably good functionality. (You can set goals to maintain your weight or gain it, although you’ll always get a big number showing your “calories left” for the day as if they were a limited resource even if you gain weight.)
The barcode scanner is free and recognized all the products I tested, but had the wrong calorie count for some: 85 calories for the mayo instead of 100, and 191 calories for the mac and cheese when it should have been 250. (Yes, I double-checked the portion sizes.)
If you want to upgrade for additional features, Premium costs $14.99 for three months.